<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BiblioScribe Book Blog &#187; Leonard Nimoy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bookblog.biblioscribe.com/tag/leonard-nimoy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bookblog.biblioscribe.com</link>
	<description>Book Marketing Tools for Authors and Publishers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Star Trek Movie&#8230;Not Quite the Old</title>
		<link>http://bookblog.biblioscribe.com/71/free-thinking/the-star-trek-movienot-quite-the-old/</link>
		<comments>http://bookblog.biblioscribe.com/71/free-thinking/the-star-trek-movienot-quite-the-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss_Mae</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Nimoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outer space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Heinlein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Shatner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookblog.biblioscribe.com/71/free-thinking/the-star-trek-movienot-quite-the-old/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This year for my Mother’s Day gift, my daughter treated me to a movie. We watched the new Star Trek.</p>
<p>As a teen, I grew up with the original show. My older brother was a science-fiction addict. One of his &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year for my Mother’s Day gift, my daughter treated me to a movie. We watched the new Star Trek.</p>
<p>As a teen, I grew up with the original show. My older brother was a science-fiction addict. One of his favorite authors was Robert Heinlein. Since I loved to read, I picked up these books and was introduced to the science-fiction world. So when Star Trek hit the air waves, my brother was hooked and I watched along with him.</p>
<p>Dad, however, would almost always turn the channel. This meant I didn’t watch every show, but I saw enough to know the characters and to develop a keen interest.</p>
<p>Years later when the series entered syndication, I was able to watch all I wanted. When the first movies came out with the original stars of William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy, I saw those too.</p>
<p>When this 2009 “remake” was announced—and especially with the advanced special effects—I was eager to see what the writers would come up with.</p>
<p>I don’t call myself an expert regarding the storylines of Star Trek. But I’ve learned what I like and what I don’t like.</p>
<p>I do like the actor who played Spock. Zachary Quinto captured the character well, acing the Vulcan’s mannerisms, and sounding almost exactly like Nimoy.</p>
<p>Karl Urban as ‘Bones’ is perfect. He looked as I’d expected a younger Leonard McCoy to be. I loved getting to know how he and James Kirk first met.</p>
<p>In the old series, I never realized Kirk was so full of himself. In this new movie, it’s quite a revelation to see how Chris Pine plays a womanizing, ultra self-confident James T. Kirk.</p>
<p>Simon Pegg as Scotty and John Cho as Sulu are both great picks.</p>
<p>Actress Zoe Saldana plays Lt. Uhura. She’s certainly attractive enough to showcase the leading female role.</p>
<p>But it’s her characterization of the communications officer that I frown and go, “hmm.”<br />
And here is where, to me, the movie does a major “hiccup.”</p>
<p>I’d like to ask the writers, “Why did you change Uhura’s personality?”</p>
<p>The television series’ Uhura understood that the U.S.S. Enterprise was a military ship and she was an officer respectful to rank. Today’s Star Trek writes Uhura as smart-mouthed, carrying a ‘chip-on-my-shoulder’ attitude.</p>
<p>That is so not realistic, nor in keeping with the original version.</p>
<p>Another disloyalty is that Uhura attempts a romantic relationship with Spock. Yes, he’s half-human, so his emotions are stronger than a pure Vulcan. However, he strove to always restrain that ‘handicapped’ side. To show him and Uhura in caressing embraces is, in my opinion, an insult to Gene Roddenberry.</p>
<p>Still, the movie is action-packed and full of adventure. I laughed out loud during the comedic scenes. And the special effects were thrilling. If I were a reviewer, I’d give a four-and-a-half star out of five rating.</p>
<p>I hope in any forthcoming sequels Uhura’s character will be critiqued and appropriately ‘ship-shaped’.</p>
<p>Copyright 2009 by L. M. Thomas</p>
         ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bookblog.biblioscribe.com/71/free-thinking/the-star-trek-movienot-quite-the-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

